Poetry Blog

How to Get Rid of Writer’s Block

Get Rid of Writer’s Block Fast

Writer’s block can be a terrible thing. Some people suffer from writer’s block for five days, and some of us are over here in the year to five-year mark. Sometimes we just can’t shake it. Sometimes our own insecurities block us from writing. Sometimes the pressure is overwhelming. In honor of my online writing class How To Beat Writer’s Block I came up with a short list of tips that might help you resolve your writer’s block issues.


When we feel pressure to perform, we fail. To lift some of this pressure. you have to start thinking about your normal routines in different ways. Don’t do the same thing every day. Move somewhere else. If you normally write at your computer, write by hand. If you normally write by hand, type on a typewriter. If you normally use the typewriter, write on the computer. Changing the way you write might help you begin to write. The pressure will be gone. You won’t be at your normal desk at the normal time with the familiar sensation that you have to write something immediately. This activity can be freeing.


Sort of like the first exercise, this is an attempt to trick your brain. For a set period of time (one day, one week, etc.) don’t think about writing and don’t write. Don’t worry about the fact that you aren’t writing. Don’t worry about any previous goals that you had set for yourself. Just don’t write. Do something else. In this period, you should be reading and scouring magazines and going to museums and sitting outside and listening to people talk and staring at plants trying to decide what kind of plants they are. You want to come back to your writing desk with a wealth of information to start from.


In an attempt to reduce the pressure and make it easier to write, you want to start with a topic you don’t care about or a topic you already know a lot about. What are you an expert in? It could be anything from sleeping to building toy cars, but you are an expert at something. Think about your expertise and write a timed 5-minute how-to article about your area. Try to be as clear and boring as possible. When you’re finished, you can take that information and change it to imperative mood. Or, if it’s already in imperative mood, switch it around and write in third person. Once you understand the basics of this activity, you can apply it to stories, poems, or essays that you’ve already written.

With these three tiny tips, you might be able to start making larger strides in writing. Writing can be hard when a million other things deserve our attention, but you have to decide what’s important and what’s necessary for you to live a full life. If that’s writing, then write! If that’s something else, then go do that.




Daria’s Reading List

After doing that interview with GIRL CANON, I started to think about reading lists. What do you currently have on your reading list? Below is mine:


Words for Empty and Words for Full- Hicok

Selected Poems- Ruefle

Dream Barker- Valentine

The Fact of a Doorframe- Rich

Madness, Rack, and Honey- Ruefle

Come, Thief- Hirshfield


But more importantly, here are some books that MTV’s Daria Morgendorffer read or talked about:


One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest- Kesey

The Dharma Bums- Kerouac

Being and Nothingness- Sartre

The Bell Jar- Sylvia Plath

Moby Dick- Melville

Howl- Ginsberg

The House of the Dead- Dostoyevsky

The Prince and the Pauper- Twain

War and Peace- Tolstoy

Babbit- Lewis

Angle of Repose- Stegner





Interview with The MFA Years

Caitlin Neely, the founder of The MFA Years, talked to us about the MFA Years and her goals for the site.

  • Why did you start The MFA Years? I wanted to create a space for creative writing students to share their experiences and advice. As I was researching programs last year, it was hard to find articles and books about the actual MFA experience. I think that’s something that’s important to make available. When I saw that The MFA Chronicles had not been updated in a few years, I knew I wanted to help fill some of that gap.
  • On your website, you say that you started The MFA Years after being inspired by The MFA Chronicles, a now-defunct blog. What was it about The MFA Chronicles that inspired you? I started reading The MFA Chronicles much later in the season, after I’d already been accepted into a couple of programs. The blog got me excited about being able to actually study poetry at the graduate level. I was able to read about the ups and downs of studying at an MFA program, and the entire process I’d just put myself through suddenly felt a lot more real and tangible. I think that “excitement” is what initially inspired me to create the website.
  • How do you find students to interview for The MFA Years? I’ve posted on a couple of MFA Draft groups and one other creative writing group on Facebook. I’ll probably be contacting a few people I know directly, but we rely mostly on students finding our website, perusing the submissions section, and contacting us themselves.
  • So how does The MFA Years work? You find students who are interested in submitting blog posts about their workshops, classes, and submission information The MFA Years is broken up into two sections: the original idea for the blog was to follow 12 creative writing students through their first year of grad. school, so that’s our main focus. The second section came a little later on and that includes all of the guest submissions and interviews. As I said above, most people have reached out to us on their own, and I’ve also asked some people I know to write guest posts.
  • Are you currently attending an MFA program? If so, what was the best advice that you received about applying? I’m a first year poetry candidate at the University of Virginia.The best advice I received from multiple people is to send in your strongest work. At one point I was considering adding a couple of form poems and long poems to my sample because I kept reading about how showing “range” is important. But I dumped them at the last second after my undergraduate mentor told me it made more sense to send in the poems I felt were the best. All of the poems in my sample ended up being very short (that’s mostly what I write) and pretty similar thematically and aesthetically. I got into some awesome programs and I don’t for a second regret sending in the work I was most confident with.
  • What are your post-MFA plans? I’m not sure. I know I’ll end up applying to post-grad fellowships. Applying to PhD programs in either rhetoric and composition or creative writing will be on the table too. The only thing I know for sure is I want to move back to Cincinnati at some point.
  • What are some MFA programs that you’re crushing on right now. (Can you crush on an MFA program? Is that a thing?) You can definitely have a crush on an MFA program. Right now I’m in love with a lot of the programs I applied to this past application season. Of course, UVA is a the top of my crush list. I had great experiences with: UIUC (specifically Michael Madonick), Miami University in Ohio (Cathy Wagner is awesome) and Saint Mary’s in California (Brenda Hillman and Matthew Zapruder are great). I love West Virginia University because they have Mary Ann Samyn. I really like UW-Madison, though, I wasn’t able to apply there.  As you can see, I have a lot of crushes.


  • If you had to give one piece of advice to a student who is just starting their MFA program, what would you say? Well, I haven’t technically started my MFA program yet so I don’t have too much advice at the moment. But right now I’d say—arrive with an open mind. You get to focus most of your energy for the next however many years on your writing. Have fun, experiment, take risks, write bad poems and/or stories. You never know where those risks and experiments will take you. And hopefully you’ll learn something from them!



Interview with Books and Shovels



Jeremiah, the founder of Books and Shovels, a traveling bookstore and publisher, sat down to give TellTell the ultimate scoop. Ya dig? (Ah. I couldn’t help myself with that one!)

What exactly is Books and Shovels?Books & Shovels is a traveling bookstore and publisher I’m launching at the 2014 NYC Poetry Festival with UndergroundBooks and Nostrovia! Poetry.  I’m Jeremiah Walton, founder of Nostrovia! Poetry.  I’m 19 y/o, and from N.H.. Some friends and I are going to be living out of Books & Shovels, a station wagon loaded down with chapbooks, street books, paintings, all forms of art that exhibit passion, and distributing the materials as we travel cross country hitting open mics, festivals, slams, and street corners.

How and when (and what were you eating/drinking) when you guys came up with the idea for Books & Shovels? Books & Shovels was initially a frame pack full of N!P and UB titles.  I distributed them while hitchhiking after I graduated high school.

What do you think Books & Shovels can offer that traditional bookstores can’t offer? How many bookstore can set up shop on a street corner, or move their place of distribution from city to city at a moment’s notice?

How do you guys feel about digital publications? The 21st century is an amazing time to be an artist.  We can hit the eyes of 1000s of readers and supporters in a day.  Nostrovia! Poetry receives over 15,000 hits per month.  It was built from the ground up, with minimal start up costs.  That’s amazing.  This is the best period of time to be an artist, a poet.  Hell, most of my books are available free through Scribd and embedded onto webpages.  We’re pretty into it.

What do you need to make Books and Shovels a success? We need pledges to jump start the journey.  This way we don’t end up stuck and homeless right off the bat, which is a very potential outcome in the long term picture.  If we end up stuck and broke, we’ll simply work through traditional channels / run Books & Shovels locally until we have enough money to migrate.

Is there a list of places that you’re going to stop? How do you decide? There’s no concrete plan.  The road has a habit of fucking those up.

What kind of soundtrack are you going to have on your drive? Ramshackle Glory, Rail Yard Ghosts, Days N Daze, there’s a lot of wonderful music we’re going to be blasting as we shoot down a sunrise highway.

Can you tell me a little bit about how Books and Shovels will work? Are you selling books? Collecting books from authors? Are you soliciting? What’s the deal? Books & Shovels is nonprofit.  All funds acquired are sunk back into the project, or purchasing books from independent publications and artists.  None of the money goes into our pockets.  We are selling books at a suggested donation price, but ultimately, the price is up to the buyer.  We are collecting donations of publications from authors and publishers currently.  

Why are you doing this? To murder apathy.  To encourage others to be willing to bleed for their dreams.  Too many folks are scared to dream. This isn’t for artists.  This is for anyone who is afraid to cut themselves open for what they love.


Interview with Girl Canon

The founder of GIRL CANON sat down with Tell Tell to talk about Harriet the Spy and her favorite GIRL CANON list.

TellTell: Why did you start GIRL CANON?

A few friends and I read n+1’s book No Regrets, which is a book of female artists and intellectuals talking about their reading life, and it really spoke to us. All of the women in that book had to deal with the Western canon at some point–to come to grips with works that didn’t depict their lived experiences or were hostile to them. They managed to find ways of reading that fed them intellectually–cherry-picking their way through the canon and supplementing with other books they heard of from their friends. Carla Blumenkranz, in her interview, talks about the idea of a “secret canon”: within any given group of people, there’s a secret list of books that everyone’s read. Blumenkranz talks about this as an intellectual measuring stick, a way of seeing who knows what’s up. Sady Doyle, in her write-up of No Regrets, “The Perils of Reading While Female”  (in In These Timestakes the idea of a “secret canon” and revises it a bit: arguing that women need to cultivate these canons, these female ways of reading, in order to create space for themselves in literature. She calls for “the public claiming of formerly secret canons” and that’s what gave me the idea for GIRL CANON. A public space where women can share the books that have fed them intellectually. No shame, no requirements: just, a celebration of reading while female.


 Why is your email “grrrlcanon.” Was “girlcanon” already taken?

“Girlcanon” was already taken, but I’m a big fan of the Riot Grrrl movement that began in the 90s, that formed as a way of interrupting traditional notions of punk rock as a very male space. The message is similar to Girl Canon’s–there are female ways of being in the world that disrupt misogynist messages and create space for women. I like to think that Bikini Kill’s “Rebel Girl” would be a Girl Canon participant and reader:

I love the idea behind GIRL CANON–it’s the website that I wished existed when I was fifteen, but I’m so happy that it exists now–what would be included on your girl canon?

Thank you! I love it too. This is a hard question. A friend and I were talking about personal lists of books that are canonical for us vs. the idea of books that are just deeply pleasurable to read. Is there a difference between books that are perfectly readable and books that are good medicine? I think, for me, there is.

Anyway, here are some books that make my list:

From my adult life:
On the Kitchen Table From Which Everything Has Been Hastily Removed Olena Kalytiak Davis
Music Like Dirt Frank Bidart
The City in Which I Love You Li-Young Lee
Games Vasko Popa
Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway
Michael Cunningham’s The Hours
James Baldwin’s Giovanni’s Room
Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice
Zora Neale Hurston’s Their Eyes Were Watching God
Henry James’ The Portrait of a Lady
Heroines Kate Zambreno

From my childhood:

Loose Woman Sandra Cisneros
Brian Jacques’ Redwall series
The Golden Compass Philip Pullman
Maniac Magee Jerry Spinelli
Judy Blume’s Starring Sally J. Freedman as Herself
Harriet the Spy Louise Fitzhugh
E.L. Konigsburg’s From the Mixed-up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler


Why not boy canon? Do you think we even need a boy canon? Or is the regular canon a boy canon? 


I think the Western canon, is, largely, a boy canon: culled and cultivated by men, and largely written by men.


I love the Sady Doyle quote you include in your “about us” section: “…the  right of women to reject that line of thinking and to believe that they are qualified to decide what literature should be.” Why do you think women don’t believe they are qualified to have a voice in what good literature is?


In No Regrets, some of the interviewees talk about reading Bukowski (or the Beats or whoever) and feeling like the writing was hostile towards or even hated women. If the literature you’re reading doesn’t write you well, that can be terribly silencing and demoralizing. Not to say that those aren’t good works of writing, but if those texts are the only kinds of texts held up to you as examples of what “good” literature does, this forms your perception of what’s considered classic and perpetuates a canon where different kinds of voices are invisible.
I hope that GIRL CANON troubles the idea of “good” literature is and messes it up a little, making more room for queer voices, writers of color, female voices. Similarly, I hope it encourages women to look at their own lists of favorite books and consider them “good”–not just personally comforting, but good works of literature.


Do you have a GIRL CANON list that you feel particularly close to?

Yes! I love Ella Mouria Seet’s because she writes about punching a pillow and crying and making grilled cheese after being devastated by The Age of Innocence. I really connect with that type of…physical reaction to a book.
Kimberly Southwick’s canon is also particularly servicey and lovely: she writes about books that saved her during particular periods in her life.

They’re all very wonderful, but those are two that stick out to me.

A few more spectacular ones: Tasha LeClair’sKristen Gunther’s, and Carmen Maria Machado’s.

 If you could live inside a book, what book what you choose and why?

My child self wanted to live in a Sharon Creech novel, where all the heroines are smart and funny and independent. My adult self prefers to read in an oversized t-shirt in her big bed and do my traveling into literature from there. Fiction is too gruesome and stressful to live inside of.


Happy Poetry Month

Happy National Poetry Month everyone! This month, I’ve already done the following poetry-related activities:

I interviewed Heavy Feather Review for American Microreviews. You can read the interview here!

I memorized half of “Ode to a Nightingale: “My heart aches and drowsy numbness pains my sense…”

I looked at Poetry Madness and I want to try to read poems by every single poet on that list.

I read this poem by John Donne.

I read this poem by Albert Goldbarth.

What have you guys done for National Poetry Month?


10 Reasons to read “The Royal Nonesuch”

Steven D. Schroeder’s “The Royal Nonesuch” came out in 2013 by Spark Wheel Press. Here are 10 reasons to read “The Royal Nonesuch” immediately.


Royal Nonesuch

1. “When I told him I feared/ the darkened yard, how long before garden gnomes/started appearing in my bedroom overnight?” (19).

2. “If by evening you mean overflowing crockpot” (23).

3. “I want to be a mogul,/ a highrise or charisma.” (24).

4. “Chlamydia is a flower and a cash crop, so drop your pants” (38).

5. “Your song made better shoes and wheels and dreams and everything/ in every single size” (40).

6. “Benjamin get/ your bindle from despond, swim the English/ language” (42).

7. “Late-night regret comes on as a brunette/ is a bullshit line yet felt right at the time” (49).

8. “Let us tomato onions/ at old McDonald’s salmonella” (53).

9. “Someone’s body/ hits a river branch and breaks in half” (71).

10. “Half of every storyteller cuts the other off–” (78).


Interview with Submittrs

Sarah, the founder of Submittrs, sat down with TellTell to gives us the nitty-gritty of her online submission management system. There is still some time to submit to their Indiegogo campaign, so go and support them!

1. How does Submittrs work?

This is a big question! Maybe I’ll focus on what it would be like to get started with an account on Submittrs. You’d have four blank pages, Pieces, Submissions, Submittees, and Ledger. You’d start by adding pieces to your Pieces page. You type in a title where it says “Enter a new piece,” click Add (or press enter), and there the piece is! All pieces have check boxes next to them. You can select pieces and then tag them using another field on the page. Later you can filter by tags to view less pieces at a time.

Then it’s time to start making submissions. They are entered on the Pieces page too. You enter the name of a Submittee (magazine, journal, agent, etc.) where it says “Enter a new submittee” and click Add. Then you use the checkboxes to select pieces and click Add Selected Pieces. (If you already had pieces selected, it will add them automatically when you enter the Submittee name.) If it’s a sim sub, you can just keep adding Submittees at this stage. If you don’t want to sim sub any of the pieces, there’s a check box you should click that says Warn me about SimSubs.

There are also fields at this point for you to note reading fees, the date of the submission, and the status of the submission. (Mostly you’ll be adding submissions that are open, but if you want to put in records of old submissions that were rejected or accepted, you do that here as well.) When you’re done, you click Save Submission.

Now you can find submissions on your Submission page. (And if there were readings fees, those now appear in the “Money I’ve spent” column on your Ledger page.) As you hear back, you’ll update your submissions on your Submission page. Click on the bold title(s) to see Submission Details. See all the pieces that went out, how long it’s been out, and enter a response. If you get an acceptance, you’ll be asked to select which pieces were accepted, and you can enter any payment you might be receiving (which will then appear in the “Money I’ve earned” column on your Ledger page). You can also make notes.

As you hear back from a lot of submissions, your Submittee page will start to fill up. It will create a list of all the submittees that have taken your work, what I like to think of as friendly markets. It will create a list of those that have invited you to submit again (I had a tendency to forget about these, especially if they said, please send again during our next reading period). It will create a list of your notes. And you can add submittees to your “Next I want to send to” list. If you click on a submitee’s name anywhere on the site, it will show you your submission history with them and their average response time.

Whew–that was a lot of information! The key is that all the pages work together, updating each other, so that the writer never feels like their actions on the site are repetitive or waste any of their time, and so that the writer always feels like they have multiple routes of access to all their information.

 2. How is Submittrs different from Submittable or other submission managers?

So glad you asked this! We don’t offer any services to journals the way that Submittable does. I see my Submittable account as working in tandem with my Submittrs account. I don’t need to actually go to my Submissions page on Submittable anymore, but I do because I’m a sucker for seeing when things go from Received to In-Progress. But if I want to see how long my submissions have been out, or my past submissions, or anything else, I go to Submittrs. I can get to the information I want more quickly on Submittrs because it’s designed for the writer’s side rather than journal’s side of submitting.

3. How did you guys come up with the idea for Submittrs?

I never found a good way to keep track of submissions before we made Submittrs. My first spreadsheet included postal addresses, reading periods, and lots of other information because I was thinking of what would save me time later instead of what would actually be good record keeping. And when I started a new spreadsheet, I found myself nicknaming batches of poems instead of putting every title. Why did I do that? I did not remember what went where two years later when I was on a new computer with only some of my documents transferred over.

I tried using Word for awhile, and when I started submitting my completed manuscript, I started an email thread that I kept updating. I ended up having my records everywhere! And I’ve read testimonials about having multiple spreadsheet, or a spreadsheet and a notebook, or a file of index cards, and more and more variations. I’ve heard about elaborate color coordinating systems. I’ve heard about computers crashing and people losing records. I’ve heard about using old websites that suddenly become defunct.

It became clear that I was not the only one struggling with the best system for this, the most time effective and helpful system. I drew a lot of pictures for my husband about how I was thinking a website could work, and we talked it all through, and he made it for me. I’m so grateful to him for doing that.

4. Can you show us some screen shots of what Submittrs looks like?

I’d love to! The video on our indiegogo shows our Demo account, but here are some shots of my account which I’ve been using for about six months now. It’s a little personal, but here goes!

This is a shot of my Pieces page, showing my unpublished pieces and filtering by what I’ve tagged as New.


And this is a shot of my Submissions page, showing my Open submissions and without filtering by any of my tags. You can see I tag by collection title and type of submission (Journal, Contest, Anthology, Press, etc.). (When you add pieces to a submission on the Pieces page, it will carry over any tags those pieces had to the submission on the Submissions page.)


5. Where do you see Submittrs in the next five years?

I hope we’re serving a lot of writers at that point! I really want to have a portion of the site that’s available to everyone for free, with features like a “This Week’s Responses” so people can see what magazines have been actively responding to submissions that week. I also hope we have features I haven’t even thought of yet because they are recommended by our users in the future. I hope it’s a great five years!